-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Result in Service #15181
Remove Result in Service #15181
Conversation
public Result getAlertPluginInstance(@Parameter(hidden = true) @RequestAttribute(value = Constants.SESSION_USER) User loginUser) { | ||
Map<String, Object> result = alertPluginInstanceService.queryAll(); | ||
return returnDataList(result); | ||
public Result<List<AlertPluginInstanceVO>> getAlertPluginInstance(@Parameter(hidden = true) @RequestAttribute(value = Constants.SESSION_USER) User loginUser) { |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Useless parameter Note
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ | |||
* @param expireTime token expire time | |||
* @return token string | |||
*/ | |||
Map<String, Object> generateToken(User loginUser, int userId, String expireTime); | |||
String generateToken(User loginUser, int userId, String expireTime); |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Useless parameter Note
} | ||
log.error("Create alert group error, groupName:{}", alertGroup.getGroupName()); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log Injection High
user-provided value
405fddf
to
3c41548
Compare
3c41548
to
5514692
Compare
5514692
to
6e18a96
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CodeQL found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
31d95fe
to
70beaa2
Compare
...uler-api/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/api/controller/AccessTokenController.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
df34684
to
ebcb7c0
Compare
ebcb7c0
to
3fe9d76
Compare
3fe9d76
to
4bb40e6
Compare
4bb40e6
to
deca8b0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. This is really a big change. Thanks 👍🏻
deca8b0
to
07a0b0a
Compare
Resolve the conflicts. |
07a0b0a
to
9ccc112
Compare
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. 3 Bugs 70.2% Coverage Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall
Purpose of the pull request
Use Result/Map<String, Object> as method result is not a good practice, this PR will refactor some service method.
Brief change log
Verify this pull request
This pull request is code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(or)
If your pull request contain incompatible change, you should also add it to
docs/docs/en/guide/upgrede/incompatible.md